All Case Files
Verdict Original Venue Illustration
Team Case · American

UAB

Conference
American Athletic
Lead Counsel
Alex Mortensen
Home Venue
Protective Stadium
Verdict Rank
No. 128
Verdict Score
24.2
0–100 case score
The Case Line
The record test

The record will tell the truth

Strength and schedule agree here — No. 128 in team strength, No. 130 in projected wins. Expect the record to fit.

Team strength
No. 128
Projected wins
No. 130
Gap
2 spots
The case in sixPreseason evidence · projected strength and schedule, not earned results
  1. 01Why are they here?

    Building a case

    UAB opens at No. 128, near the foot of the national field, and No. 13 in the American. In the preseason that placement comes down to one thing: how good the roster projects to be.

    0.3 behind No. 127 Ball State0.6 clear of No. 129 Air Force
  2. 02What's helping them?

    • Developing Team Strength24.2

      How good the team actually is — talent, roster and returning production.

    03What's hurting them?

    • No earned résumé yet

      What they have actually done — who they beat, who beat them, and how good those teams were.

  3. 04What would change Verdict's mind?

    UAB is 0.3 Verdict points behind No. 127 Ball State — that's the gap to close.

    • Start playing to begin earning a résumé
    • Beat a quality opponent to log a Statement Win
    • String together dominant wins for Game Control
  4. 05Where are they headed?

    Earned So Far
    No games played
    The record is blank until the first kickoff
    Projected Finish
    4-8
    29% likeliest outcome
    Expected Wins
    4.2
    Bowl Odds
    17%
    Playoff Odds
    <1%
    90% Range
    2-10 to 6-6

    Favored in 4 of 12

    Schedule value · projected
  5. 06What's next?

    at Illinois
    Week 1 · Away · Verdict win probability 6%

    Until this game is played the case is built on projected strength and schedule — this is the first real evidence on the board. Verdict has them at 6%, which makes a win the strongest evidence available this early.

    Test the matchup
How they play versus what the résumé shows awaits game evidence · Evidence 17% complete · 1 of 6 categories active
The people on the field

Who carries this case

Chris Burge is back at DE after 3.5 sacks. Jalen Kitna (2,462 passing yards), Jevon Jackson (900 rushing yards), Iverson Hooks (927 receiving yards) and Devin Hightower (81 tackles) are gone.

UAB's 2025 statistical leaders, and whether they are still here. Recorded production only — Verdict does not grade a player.

Back for 2026
Chris BurgeDE
Sack leader·3.5 sacks
Gone from 2025
Jalen KitnaQB
Leading passer·2,462 passing yards (13 TD, 11 INT)
Jevon JacksonRB
Leading rusher·900 rushing yards (5 TD)
Iverson HooksWR
Leading receiver·927 receiving yards (72 rec, 7 TD)
Devin HightowerLB
Leading tackler·81 tackles (3 TFL, 1 sack)

Source: public roster and 2025 player statistics · production is a record, not a projection

The offseason record

What changed before a snap

They went 4-8 in 2025 and lost the scoreboard by 11.8 a game, scoring 317 and allowing 459.2025

What the offseason gave them
  • UAB went shopping: 38 in, top of the class a 0.86-rated LB out of Colorado.2026 transfer portal
  • A 0.86-rated RB from Georgia and a 0.86-rated S from SMU arrived alongside him.2026 transfer portal
What it cost them
  • The door swung the wrong way: 33 out against 38 in.2026 transfer portal
  • A 0.88-rated WR left to Oregon — the one they will miss first.2026 transfer portal
  • They were outscored by 11.8 a game last season on the way to 4-8.2025

Real game evidence switches on the moment these teams actually play.· Data: CollegeFootballData API

AVGS

Statistical Record

No completed games for UAB at this point in the season.

Browse the full Statistical Record
The season ahead

The games that decide this case

6 of the 12 are away from home, and none of them against the top 25.

  1. Week 1 sends them to #27 Illinois.
  2. Week 9 sends them to #32 USF.
  3. Week 6 is a trip to #54 Memphis.
  4. Week 13 ends it, on the road at North Texas.
The full schedule on The Docket
The rivalries
The Evidence

What this case is built on

Case Intelligence

New evidence from the wire

Link-only reporting from independent publishers. Opens at the source. Never affects any Verdict metric.

Jury Pulse

Do you uphold #128?

Weigh the evidence and rule on UAB's current case.

Cast the first vote
File an AppealRender your own verdict using the evidence.

The arguments about UAB

All arguments →
Continue the investigation

Test UAB's case against the field.

Run the next matchup through the model, or put this team where you think it belongs.

Baseline established — No. 128. Every move from here is logged with its previous rank, its new rank and the evidence event that caused it. A case never moves without a traceable reason.

Facts from the CollegeFootballData API and Verdict-curated public records. Names are used for identification and commentary only.
VerdictThe Courthouse of College Football

Every Team. Every Game. Follow the Evidence.

Verdict's better with more people to argue with.

Verdict is an independent college football analytics and editorial project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, sponsored by, or operated by the NCAA, College Football Playoff, conferences, schools, teams, polls, broadcasters, or data providers. Team and organization names are used only for factual identification. All third-party trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.

© 2026 Verdict. All rights reserved.
HQ
Add Verdict to your Home Screen
Open the courthouse in one tap, like an app.